Despite the expected challenges proposed by the upcoming Roller Rights Act, the British landlord continues to see the value of buying investment, and it is expected that only one -fifth can reduce the scale of the investment portfolio in the coming year.
This is a recent survey of the landlord based on the Capital Capital. The survey found that last year, the vast majority of people had rarely changed their leased property investment portfolios.
About 90 % of the investigations said that the scale of their investment portfolio remains unchanged, and only 7 % of people decided to reduce their scale, which showed that the narrative outside the landlord of the private lease department was seriously exaggerated.
However, from the coming year, 21 % of people expressed their intended to reduce the scale of the investment portfolio, and 75 % of people decided to remain unchanged, and 4 % of them planned to increase it again.
For those who plan to reduce their investment portfolios this year, the proposal has listed it as the first reason for this measure to pass the upcoming Rental Roller Rights Act.
The Labor government ranks second, and the third factor is that they are about to retire.
When asked about what aspects they think that the Rental Rights Act, they will face the biggest challenge to the landlord, and the second one of the second 1 “no loss of deportation” will be the highest.
It is the second largest challenge to prohibit landlords from renting benefits or benefits with children, while short -term holding of leases.
The results of the comment results, Jonathan Samuels, said: “It can be said fairly that landlords who have been discussed in recent years have greatly exaggerated the market’s efforts.
“However, there is no doubt that the government has influenced the consistent movement of the landlord through legislative changes, and in a large number of inadequate markets, we are unable to drive investors.”
He added: “Unfortunately, it seems that more can choose to withdraw in 2025, and the key reason for this decision is that the tenant’s rights bill. Of course, although any improvement of tenants’ benefits is positive, they are worried about The landlord was ignored in the expected change. “
