Anyway, we who have sharesParkervisionEssence
The plot seemed thicker.
You may still remember the jury unanimously ruledprkrThe compensation for Qualcomm in 2013 was $ 173 million.
After all, in 1999, they showed their internal emails to Qualcomm senior managers: “The fact is that Parkvis accidentally discovered revolutionary things.” At that time, this was CEO of Qualcomm: “This It is the key technology we must log in. “
You can see everythingThis videoI used to link.
Rather than licensed PRKR’s technology (eventually living in billions of mobile phones), not the unanimous view of the jury, but stole it.
It took ten years to try the case in front of the jury. Giants such as Qualcomm can afford legal talents who are really good at delay.
But that is: US $ 173 million in the past using intellectual property rights, and the franchise fee for the negotiation of everyonefutureuse. The judge seemed good about this.
Then six months later, he withdrew his judgment from blue.
What?
what happened?
Today, what did PRKR releaseItIt is the first in the “Opposition Giant” video series.
The greater significance-and why at least the attraction of the inventor and patent lawyer is that Qualcomm is not the only technology giant of squeezing small inventors. Essence In addition to the real non -Americans and unfairness, this may affect our global competitiveness.
According to the “Episode 1” of “Against the Giant”, I am justLook atQualcomm is a frequent visitor to the Parkervision website. There is no surprise there. However, a few days after Qualcomm CEO presided over Obama’s fundraising activities, a computer visited in the White House. After those days, Obama’s appointed judge proposed a verdict.
If the president has any direct participation, I will be surprised. He is still my hero. However, that night, was he the assistant to PRKR’s lawsuit that threatened PRKR by CEO of Qualcomm?
We may not have heard of such an end.
I just asked ChatGPT: “What is the status of Parkervision patent lawsuit?”
Parkervision participated in a number of patent execution operations. This is a short update about some of its key litigation conditions:
- Parkervision complaint: The Federal Circuit Court recently overturned the previous non -infringement ruling and returned the case to the District Court further. This means that the case will continue in the Florida District Court.
- Parkervision lg electronic product: The case has remained unchanged before the final decision of Qualcomm.
- Parkervision v. MediaTek: The case is currently under trial. The claims construction hearing will be held on January 26, 2024, and the trial date on April 14, 2025 is set.
- Parkervision to refer to Realtek: This case is also in the trial. The claims construction hearing will be held on January 26, 2024, and the trial date on March 17, 2025 is set.
Parkervision continues to actively take its patent law enforcement operation to protect its patented technology.
Therefore, I asked: “On January 26, 2024, what was the result of the construction hearing of MediaTek and Realtek?”
On January 26, 2024, the construction hearing of the Parkervision case in MediaTek and Realtek was required to causeParkervision’s favorable rulingEssence In these two cases, the court adopts the proposed claim construction of Parkervision through most controversial terms.
Stocks can still be zero. Or, you can imagine, to 5 or. Essence Essence Who knows?
I have ridiculous shares. I intend to sell these stocks and rise as the price rises, these stocks will rise during the test, but I hope that many of them will seize the opportunity of justice, maybe even in the end, or even wonderful. Finally, the last chance is completed in my life.
Editor’s Note: This article was originally published at Andrewtobias.com on January 30, 2025, and was jointly permitted.
